Simgot SuperMix 5 Review 

Intro 

Hello, this review and feature covers the latest from the audio brand Simgot named the Simgot SuperMix 5 ($219). The SuperMix 5 is a five-driver “quadbrid” (1DD, 1BC, 2BA, 1MP) in-ear monitor and is the successor to one of the most beloved iems, the wonderful Simgot SuperMix4 (SuperMix4 Review). The SuperMix4 is a four-driver quadbrid set with 1DD, 1BA, 1PL, & 1PZT drivers cohesively tuned to form one of the best iems that money can buy under $175. Simgot truly caught lightning in a bottle with that set. I have to be straight with you all, the SuperMix4 was a set which drew much praise from many of the more notable reviewers, yet it also drew some critics out of the woodwork too. Like any set, there were those who simply didn’t jive with its unabashed energy, as well as its multi-layered and dynamic sound. I can tell you that I have the SuperMix4 in my personal rotation at all times. It is that good. However, that begs the question, “Will the SuperMix 5 have the same wonderful mix of analytical cleanliness and musicality”? Lord knows it has an even more complex matrix of drivers which hopefully will push resolution, dynamism, and staging even further. I suppose that only time will tell. I have the SuperMix 5 set to make it to my home in about five days. For the record, I am more excited about the SuperMix 5 than I have been for most any iem in quite some time. 

Simgot

Born in 2015 and with a simple agenda to craft and create solid products with a touch of class. Simple & Elegant, Genuine & Outstanding,Technology are the words which were cleverly created to combine and form the name “Simgot”. Almost a mission statement in the name. I dig it. So, they’ve been around over a decade now, which is quite a feat in this hobby. Anyways, Simgot started out with all the potential in the world back in the day. Releasing much adored sets like the Simgot EN700, EN700 Bass, and EN700 Pro. Three, differently tuned, but also highly regarded iems during that time. Despite that initial success, they seemed to go quiet after the EN series took off. So much so, that it seemed Simgot was all but gone from the scene. From what I can remember, there was a rough two-year lull in which Simgot didn’t really make anything of note. At least not to the degree that we see today. 

Trajectory Change… 

That all began to change around 2022 with the Simgot EN1000 as they began to really gain momentum once again and truly produce some amazing iems. Simgot released some very special sets in the Simgot EN1000, and EA2000 which both did marginally well and were highly regarded amongst reviewers. However, it wasn’t until the magic of the Simgot EA500 (EA500 Review) hit the market that this brand truly exploded! The EA500 was everywhere! On the lips and in the ears of everyone! Every thread, post, and every feed seemed to showcase the EA500. Deservedly so. After the EA500, Simgot went scorched-earth and absolutely took over the audio game for a strong 2-year run. I mean sets like the Simgot EW200 (EW200 Review), EA1000 (EA1000 Review), EA500LM (EA500LM Review), EM6L (EM6L Review), ET142 (ET142 Review), EW300 (EW300 Review) as well as the Simgot SuperMix4 (SuperMix4 Review). One after the other Simgot became one of the hottest and most sought after brands and that trajectory has yet to fade off. Personally, I feel that Simgot is one of a handful of brands which should always be taken seriously and paid attention to if you regard price-to-performance, clever tuning, and pure class as good qualities to have. 

 Brain-Burn

The SuperMix 5 finally arrived folks. Of course, it would be the SuperMix 5 which took the long route to my home. At any rate, the SuperMix 5 is clearly a very well-done set. Now, I didn’t always feel this way. In fact, upon receiving this set it took quite a while for me to come to terms with its tuning in relation to the SM4. However, after many hours of brain burn logged and time spent I have become very impressed by the SuperMix 5. This brings up this one nagging question. That is, does the SuperMix 5 stand up next to the competition? At $219, it competes directly with another wildly popular Simgot set, the Simgot EA1000, as well as too many solid iems to list here todah. There are a multitude of very strong performers under $250 which gives the consumer a great problem to have, but also a difficult road for any iem in this range. No doubt about it, the SuperMix 5 will be compared to many under $250 iems in my collection. However, I am definitely ready to begin this review. So, without delay, let’s get this thing going…the Simgot SuperMix 5… 

Non-Affiliated Purchasing Links:

–Linsoul

–Amazon

–Aliexpress

SuperMix 5 Pros

-Very lightweight with a solid resin chassis

-Very large, but also very comfortable 

-Nice aesthetic appeal, very simple, minimalist 

-Nice warm/neutral and clean sound

-The spectrum carries a very nice tonal balance, very mature

-The SM5 is extremely cohesive across this unique driver configuration 

-Wonderfully clean sound, great clarity, and such a rich sound 

-Fast and textured bass

-Melodic and highly detailed midrange, great for realistic vocals

-Non-Offensive treble. A nice part to a great whole

-Highly detailed across the board

-The SuperMix 5 has a multi-layered sound field

-Fantastic imaging ability 

-Very immersive, and expansive soundstage with great depth and height

SuperMix 5 Cons

-Shells may be too large for smaller ears

-This is not a continuation of the SM4’s tuning

-Bass may lack weight for some

-Treble not as sparkly, or extended as one may enjoy

-Overall lack of exuberant energy and sparkly vibrance 

-Those who don’t enjoy this tuning will not feel that $219 is worth it for the SM5 with so many great sets within its range (I don’t feel that way) 

Gear used for testing 

–Shanling UP6

–Shanling UA6 

–Ifi Go Blu 

–Hidizs S9 Pro Plus  

–Shanling UA7

–Shanling H0

–Hidizs AP80 Pro Max 

–Fiio JM21 

–Hiby R3 Pro II

–Hiby R6 Pro II 2025 

–Shanling M1 Plus

–IBasso DX240 with Amp8 MK2 

–Shanling M6 Ultra 

–Fiio Q15

Packaging / Accessories 

Unboxing Experience 

The SuperMix 5 arrived at my home in a medium sized cardboard box fitted with a sleeve covering. The sleeve has a nicely rendered holographic drawing of the Internals within the SuperMix 5 overlaid on top of a vibrant purple color on the cover. So, take off the sleeve and you’ll be met with a thin layer of cardboard which you simply remove. Get that out of the way and you’ll see the SuperMix 5 earphones staring back at you and sitting within foam cut-outs. Next to the earphones are two smaller boxes. The smallest box carries the most of the accessories (eartips, cable adapters), while the other box houses the carrying case. Altogether you’ll get a fairly nice unboxing. Nothing that will change your life, but definitely a good quality unboxing experience for the cost of the SuperMix 5. 

Eartips

Simgot includes a total of six pairs of eartips and two styles of eartips as well. Both styles of tips are silicone, good quality, and both provide slightly different tonal differences. The first set of three (S, M, L) eartips are a white silicone tip with a black inner stem. Simgot adds these tips with just about every set. These tips have a semi rigid stem with a slightly less firm flange and a semi-wide bore size. Very similar in size and shape to the KBear 07 eartips, yet not as firm. I found that I could get a good seal with these tips but I opted for the second set of three (S, M, L) tips that I’ll be talking about. These tips are also a white silicone eartips with a red stem. Once again, these too are shaped and appear very similar to the KBear 07 eartips. The red stem set comes with a firmer flange as well as a more rigid stem. I actually got the perfect seal with this set. Very much in the same way that the 07’s fit my ears. It’s great to see that Simgot is adding in relevant eartips which add to the experience. Unlike so many brands who simply toss in any old eartips, whether they make sense for the sonic characteristics of their iem or not. Both sets of tips color the sound to a degree and do work nicely with the SuperMix 5. Thankfully, I didn’t need to go through 1,000 sets of tips trying to find the perfect match. 

Carrying Case

Simgot adds in a nice carrying case with the package. It’s made of black leather, nice stitching, with a magnetic flap for a closure. I like the magnetic flap as it has that easy and quick access to what’s inside rather than the zipper cases that we so often see. Also, how many of those zipper cases come with a non-working zipper? Trust me, it’s a problem. Anyways, the case also has a nice internal lining as well as a couple different compartments inside made of fabric mesh which enables me to store extra sets of tips as well as the cable adapters. To add to that, the case also has a good size to it too. I am easily able to fit the earphones and the cable. Though, I don’t think I’d be able to add very much more. However, it’s a solid case, made well, looks slick, and is perfect for tossing into a bag or even storing in a pocket. Not bad at all. 

Cable

The cable provided in the packaging is a fairly nice addition. Nice enough that I never felt the need to swap cables, which is a great thing. So, the cable provided is a white wire with black fittings and it is a modular cable which comes with both a 3.5 single ended and 4.4 connectors. I was very happy to see that. Any set over $100 should be modular these days. Especially with the low cost of some of these cables. So, the cable is a 2-pin style modular cable made out from single crystal copper (OFC) and designed with a litz structure. The included cable is also made light enough that they won’t pull the SuperMix 5 out of your ears. The cable also has a nice threaded fitting for holding on the cable connector adapters nice and tight. At the end of the day, I definitely have other cables which may look a hair better, but the cable provided works great, sounds nice, and is made very well. So, once again, good job Simgot. 

Build / Aesthetic / Internals / Fit 

Build Quality

The Simgot SuperMix 5 is a well-built set folks. I wouldn’t say it’s anything that we haven’t seen before, but it’s substantial enough, light enough, and durable enough to be considered a solid build. In fact, the shells are around 7-8 grams in total weight, so very light. The shells themselves are made out of semi-transparent resin, dark amber/black in color. They were made by way of 3D printing and come with multiple acoustic ducts for each of the drivers coupled with four-way RC crossovers as well as multi-channel damping. Now, the faceplates are crafted out of CNC machined aviation grade aluminum. Now, the shells are pretty big. Please hear me. They are big enough that I feel I have to say that the shells may be a trouble for people with smaller ears. The SuperMix 5 definitely trumps the SuperMix 4 in total size by a slight margin. Both are bigger than your average set of earphones. The nozzles are average in size and width, about 6mm. Nothing that will put a strain on the average hobbyist ear. Though I do like that the nozzle tip is made of aluminum rather than resin. All things considered, the build is certainly fitting of a set costing $219. It features many acoustic ducts as well as dedicated outlets for the bone conduction driver. Simgot always makes smart and quality builds and the SuperMix 5 build is no different. 

Aesthetic 

Okay, now the aesthetic, or appearance of the SuperMix 5 is obviously a subjective thing. I absolutely love the look because it is such a bold minimalist style design. Also, I love that the SuperMix 5 appears to be entirely black yet with a simple logo on the faceplates. Such a nice and simple, yet classy design. That is exactly what Simgot does with every set that they create. Always handsome, always elegant looking, and always simple. On the back of the shells there is yellow writing which says “Simgot SuperMix 5 “ and then lists the driver configuration as well as an “L” for left, or an “R” for right. Anyways, it’s a slick looking set folks. 

Internals 

Now we get to the meat of this review, or at least the engine which drives this set. Like I said, the SuperMix 5 carries a five-driver configuration consisting of one dynamic driver, two balanced armature drivers, one bone conduction driver, and one micro-planar driver. To take on the low-end Simgot chose an 8 mm DLC (Diamond-like Carbon) driver with flexible surround. To handle the midrange duties Simgot used two balanced armature drivers. They don’t list the make and model of the drivers, but they do say they are large capacity BA’s. Next, Simgot added in a bone conduction driver which handles the area around 200hz to 7khz which brings on some haptic feel which channels through the skull. Lastly, to handle the treble duties Simgot went with one micro-planar driver. I’m beginning to see more and more how nice micro-planar drivers can be at resolving treble in a non-harsh way whilst still sounding brilliant and crisp. Once again, Simgot also added in a RC four-way crossover to partition out each driver’s frequency responsibility. Folks, Simgot does nothing by accident. They labor long and hard hours trying to come up with the right driver tincture to exhort the best sonics possible, and they do it with every iem that they produce. Just trust me on this, the drivers and acoustic tech employed are fantastic. 

Fit / Comfort 

When it comes to fit and comfort, I find the Simgot SuperMix 5 to be perfectly fine. Yes, they are a hair larger than the average set, but I still have a comfortable feel with them in my ears. Never was I plagued with discomfort or needing to rip them out of my ears from wear fatigue. However, you have to know that if you have smaller ears the SuperMix 5 may be a slight issue. Obviously, find the best tips for your ears too. Thankfully, the included tips work wonderfully for my ears, but you may need something different, so keep that in mind. 

Drivability / Pairings

Sensitivity 

The Simgot SuperMix 5 is what I’d call an easy set to drive to volume and good dynamics. Simgot reports the SuperMix 5 as having an impedance of right around 19 ohms and a sensitivity of 120 db’s. Basically, on paper they are very easy to drive. I used every weakest source in my arsenal and each one played back just fine. Enough to have some great listening sessions. As with every review I used weak sources like my old Android phones with the 3.5 single ended jack. I used my iPad, three different weak 3.5 single ended dongle dacs. It really is an easy set to drive. So, if you don’t have a good dongle. Dac or a solid dac/amp then don’t worry because the SuperMix 5 will sound fine on just about any source power. 

Scaling

With that said, the Simgot SuperMix 5 most certainly scales very well with additional power. In fact, I’d say that the BC driver as well as the BA’s seem to open up to their true potential with some good and clean power from my source, as with most iems. One of my favorite pairings comes from the Shanling UA7 as that warm tube sound and big power (577 mW) really do stretch the dynamic range and moves these drivers in such a fluid and wonderful way. The point is, the extra power truly brings out the best in this set. I have many other source devices which have a lot more juice on tap and time after time I proved myself right that the SuperMix 5 clearly scales well with power. 

Tonal Pairings

The Simgot SuperMix 5 has what I’d call a neutral sound color with a vibrant upper-mid emphasis, as well as a sublevel boost and it sounds the best with any source ranging from warm/neutral to neutral. I didn’t like straight warm sources or straight-up bright or colder sources. I find that the warm sources tend to make the lows a hair too muddled and less pronounced and clean, and the colder sources exaggerate the highs making them a hair too harsh to be natural. Having said that, the SuperMix 5 has that golden source color of warm/neutral which tends to work with the widest range of source tonalities. However, it does have some brighter hues brought on from the upper-mid emphasis which does tailor more towards a slightly warmer source. Coincidentally, I like my warm/neutral sources the best. Still, I’ll be honest (as always), almost every source I have ranges from warm/neutral to neutral besides a few sources which simply didn’t work as well. 

What do you need? 

In my opinion, I’d try to get a good dongle dac at the least. Something with some decent power on tap. You don’t need some large desktop unit to drive this set folks. Just a powerful and clean dongle dac. I found my best pairing was with the Hiby R6 Pro II 2025, the Shanling UA7, the Shanling M6 Ultra, and my Fiio Q15, but the SuperMix 5 truly does well with many different sources. Too warm and too bright will emphasize the wrong areas a bit too much. 

Sound Impressions 

*Note: before I begin the sound portion of this review, I want to fill you all in with a few caveats. First, I did burn-in the SuperMix 5 for about three days in total. Now, I didn’t hear any major changes, nor did I think the SuperMix 5 needed any serious changes. So, whether you need to burn-in this set is questionable. I used many sources for review. Too many to name here. I used stock tips and stock cable. The Android music player of my choice is mainly UAPP (USB Audio Player Pro), Hiby Music Player, and Eddict Player for some of my sources. One more thing, I found that too deep of insertion dials down the bass a hair. So, I went with slightly larger tips. I thought putting smaller tips on and pressing the Shells tighter against my ears would better help the BC driver to work. I was definitely not correct on that. So, just be aware. 

What’s it sound like? 

The Simgot SuperMix 5 without question shows-off the natural progression of this series but has some key differences from the SuperMix 4 which I’ll explain later. That said, the SuperMix 5 is the culmination of everything that Simgot has learned. Such a tactile, textured, and musical presentation with perfectly cohesive and homogenized drivers replaying my music library in confident concert with each other. I hear no peaks or harsh abrasiveness as well as no mushy and muddy lows. The sound as a whole is liquid in its cohesiveness with a tuneful quality that is very pleasant to the ear. All five drivers blend very well as they ride the sonic wave, perfectly in balance and with beautiful cadence. Every inflection sounds very deliberate and exact with acute and glass-lined note outlines and a surface texture that is realistic rather than coarse. So, without question the SuperMix 5 is indeed the result of Simgot trying to correct what some called out on the SuperMix 4. But is it better? Sure, there are going to be those who don’t align with this set, but I imagine that those folks will be few and far in between. The SuperMix 5 is a damn fine iem folks, and I’m very happy to report on it today. However, the big question that I was trying to find out is whether this fine set is a true upgrade from the SM4 (SuperMix4), or not. Or maybe it isn’t on a direct tuning line with the SM4 at all. Maybe it’s simply different. I am certainly going to answer that out as I go along, from my perspective. 

Great

I find that the timbre is right around neutral/natural with a slightly warmed sublevel lift and a slightly more vibrant upper half. That is, vibrant without the harshness. If anything, I’d call this a U-shaped sound, but I’m barely happy with that. I say this because the mids are forward, present, and full-bodied and the treble or bass are not overtly emphasized. The general tonal color leans neutral yet with a touch of boost from the sub-bass. The SuperMix 5 also gets a clean presence boost from the BC driver providing a slight hit of haptic feel and added body to notes. Beyond that, the SuperMix 5 also has a vibrant midrange, it’s forward, very clean, and has a nice semi-rich note body. Great for vocalists and instruments. To add to that, the SuperMix 5 has a very non-offensive yet subtly crisp treble but could use a bit more extension. I find nothing is harsh, or too sharp and everything sounds very well defined with smoothly etched out note contours. There’s also a nice balance across the mix as no one area seems to dominate the rest. Perhaps the upper-mids have a slight bit more forward presence, but for the most part the balance is great. Transients are rapid as note attack carries some pep, some vigor, while they decay in a sprightly manner. However, that decay is not so rapid that the sound comes across as artificial. Plucked instruments or strings have that satisfying edge and snap to them along with the tacky attack of a drum hit. I hear natural cymbals, nothing tizzy or splashy, and vocalists sound forward, with a perfectly toned-down vibrance that makes them feel intimate, slightly forward, and clean. I think what I enjoy the most is the SuperMix 5’s measured energy and macro-dynamic expression which makes literally every track simply sound lively, yet not in an offensive manner at all.

Bone-Conduction

One aspect of the tuning which is very evident is how the BC driver provides a tactile and palpable dimension to the sound which aids the lows through the midrange with some richness and some added depth. This isn’t an overpowering bullishness, but a subtle fullness provided to the intonations of every note in the ranges that the BC driver was employed to handle. The BC driver has many effects that occur as a result of its implementation. The stage comes across slightly more holographic, slightly deeper, whilst adding that dense feel and surface texture in a realistic way. Almost like adding some reserved physicality to the sound that wouldn’t be there had it not been for the BC driver. It truly helps this set’s sonics to feel more robust and more intentional. Without that driver I’m afraid the sound would simply be an analytical and dry mess. There’d be less of a rigid roundness and more of a papery feel to my music. Thankfully, Simgot knows exactly what they are doing because the SuperMix 5 sounds fantastic folks. 

50/50

One of the key features of the Simgot SuperMix 5’s sound is the visceral sense of presence that it provides my music. Really, the midrange especially, as it carries such a nice mix of musicality and clean technical precision. The SuperMix 5 has what I’d call a smooth cadence yet with just enough crispness when called upon. Couple that with the intimate but also vast sound field. The technical prowess of this set is on full display every time I listen as those transients display a whiplike style of clean precision, snap on attack, and note density. Every note feels compact, nothing mushy and nothing veiled at all. Each track carries great clarity and Hi-Res style resolution which gives every note a very imprinted or embossed presence. You see, the SuperMix 5 has crystalline note articulation as even the most subtle details sound highlighted against the rest of the mix. Well, within reason. I’d say that musicality and analytical prowess split the bill, 50/50, with each doing surprisingly well as Simgot did a fine job of balancing both styles of tuning. No, the SuperMix 5 is not “musical” in the traditional sense of overly warm, bass driven, and fun. It’s musical in its harmoniously smooth demeanor and liquid fluidity. It’s fluid in everything I play through these transducers. However, the sound is so clean, so precise for the cost and the bass never masks any area or cloggs lines between notes making separation, Imaging, and micro-details easy to discern. So… 50/50. 

Issues? 

However, there are issues to be had. The SuperMix 5 does lack some upper treble air which would provide a bit more sparkle and shimmer. I suppose using different sources helps, but for the most part the treble is probably a hair too safe for my perfect taste. Another issue is that the upper-mids are a hair too thinned out and slightly too exuberant. Also, please hear me, I am being so ridiculously picky here because I do enjoy this set quite a lot. Lastly, there is a slight sublevel roll-off, but that doesn’t bother me all too much. Perhaps for some folks. However, I could use a hair more warmth and mid-bass focus. But honestly, the way that Simgot tuned this set and the cohesiveness of the drivers that they used really does help the Simgot SuperMix 5 to bring it all together very well. The sound is very tuneful, it’s precise, it’s clean, and the sound has plenty of energy to keep my feet moving. Also, the sound isn’t boring at all either. So far so good. Let’s check out each 3rd of the mix… 

Bass Region

The low-end of the SuperMix 5 is a very clean-lined and technically astute bass with just enough kick and rumble to represent most genres. However, this is a quality over quantity style of bass which is not going to impress the bass bois amongst us. Shoot, it may not impress even moderate bass bois. Simgot went for clarity on this set, and the bass perfectly exemplifies that tuning strategy with super defined and cleanly rendered drums, bass guitars, etc. I hear a semi-forceful boom, a clean attack, great presence, and a very fast decay that can literally make its way around any and every complex track. So, I love it. Of course, I also know that the bass is not going to appease every track to my perfect taste. As I said earlier, I could certainly use a bit more mid-bass warmth and muscle to add a hair more weight and body to notes. Yes, the BC driver helps a lot, adds vibrance, adds rigidity, adds physicality too, but missing that hard weighted hollow boom of a kick drum makes it not my ideal. Still, if that’s the only complaint then the SuperMix 5 is doing well. Besides, that slight lack is a very minor criticism and also, I’m not saying that the SuperMix 5 has no weight. Not saying that at all. It’s there, it’s simply not to the level that I enjoy all the time. Furthermore, there are many-many tracks that I’ve heard which totally go against everything that I’ve just said. I simply know my music and know what I like to hear and having a touch more of a weighted impact would’ve been perfect. You also have to consider that Simgot went with an 8mm DD which isn’t moving nearly as much air. So, that 7-8 dB bass shelf won’t sound like a 10mm bass shelf with the same emphasis. In theory anyways. Overall, it gets a thumbs-up from me. 

Speed

What I really love is the speed, the timbre, the separation of notes, and the perfectly defined, semi-dense, and condensed feel of the bass. In my opinion, there is some good punch and physicality when a track calls for it but it sounds more like a planar style, or balanced armature style bass in its transient attack through decay. No doubt about it that Simgot used a very speedy driver which can stop-and-go on a dime. Attack has that hard snap, that quick acute intensity which highlights the attack. I can hear this quite well with stuff like snares and kick drums. It’s a clean bass folks. If you are looking for speed and quality with a less obese, but more streamlined and snappy bass then I certainly have the set for you. There’s an exactness to the bass which sounds amazing in tracks that feature super heavy moments. Like big bass drops don’t disappoint me. You’d think it would. However, the SuperMix 5 really does show up when it’s needed. Tracks like “Got Your Back” by Washed Out sound full, convex, and very rigid. Or “Kids With Guns” by the Gorillaz. Another track featuring very heavy foundational bass where the SuperMix 5 doesn’t disappoint. In fact, in some ways it sounds much better because of the very definitive way the SuperMix 5 is able to define those notes and partition off those notes to clear the air for the rest of the melody to shine through. So, the speed helps, the clarity helps, and the philosophy is sound. It just won’t be for everyone. Like anything in this hobby. 

Sub-Bass 

The sub-bass is definitely the most emphasized portion of the bass region and I find it to be very good. I mean, highly refined in its technical accuracy with enough sublevel rumble to satisfy most demanding tracks. Songs like “Groove” by Ray Wylie Hubbard begin with a heavy and gritty bass guitar riff that literally any set can sound authoritative with. What I found is that the SuperMix 5 has plenty of that guttural and juddering weight. The rumbles are present, yet they don’t hang around and linger. Decay is controlled and isn’t cavernous or all encompassing. The beauty of this bass isn’t in its muscle, however. Once again, the beauty of this bass is in its clarity that it affords the rest of the spectrum. I say that because I can hear absolutely everything in crystalline detail. Add to that the mids have that beautiful semi-rich and clarity rich sound which makes the song so well played on this set. Folks, I’m telling you, if you want a bass that never gets in the way yet can provide some measured authority whilst also never clouding, veiling, or adding any kind of muddiness to the mid-bass and beyond, then the SuperMix 5 should fit that bill. No, the sublevels won’t rumble your eyes out of the sockets, and no you won’t be blessed by the type of juddering bullishness which tickles your ears. I really want to get across that this moderately emphasized sub-bass is very good at this price. 

Mid-Bass 

Honestly, the mid-bass is probably the area that I enjoy less than any other only because if Simgot would’ve added a few more db’s to this region, it would’ve been very special. Listening to bass-led tracks, Jazz, or Hip-hop, the mid-bass can leave a little to be desired. I want to stress that I really do find that I can still enjoy that music quite a lot and I don’t feel that the mid-bass lacks so much that it spoils it for me. That is not the case. However, we already know this, we talked about it, and now we are moving on because emphasis aside this bass is absolutely a treasure for detail hunters and Clarity-Boys. The mid-bass does have a quick, semi-rigid and clean punch. Nothing pillowy here. No, it isn’t emphasized to the stars, but it is hard edged. Remember, this bass is all about quality. Call it “controlled authority”. Extremely well textured with not even a hint of mid-bass bloom. To add to that, the bass doesn’t even touch the midrange which promotes a very crystalline and clean sound. This is where the BC driver comes in to pick up the slack. More on that later. Back to the mid-bass, folks, it is so quick, so detailed and the weight will show up when called upon. Listening to Blink-182‘s track “Anthem Part 3”, the SuperMix 5 keeps up perfectly with every last drum hit in this maniacal and ultra complex and speedy passage of music. Not many DD bass sets keep up quite like the SuperMix 5. Every last note has that edge detail and texture which brings on a kinetic sense of palpability to this track. No, it isn’t super weighted and booming, but it has a high level of quality to it and I can say that is very impressive. 

Downsides to the Bass Region 

The biggest gripe covering the bass region is everything I’ve said within my Bass Region review section. If only Simgot would’ve added a touch more weight to the left side of the spectrum then we wouldn’t even be saying this right now. Granted, it barely even bothers me because this set is so good as so much else. Still, I know that the bass output is going to put some people off and I’m really trying to drive this point home so that you aren’t caught off guard and purchase a set that doesn’t align with your likes and dislikes at all. Please believe me, I’ve spent countless hours dissecting the sound, making notes, rewind-play, rewind-play, rewind-play, over and over again. The bass is definitely a true moderate bass. However, I am also telling you all that this is one of the higher quality bass displays that $219 can get you. So, it’s all about preferences here. Just like any set. 

Midrange 

When it comes to the midrange, I’d go as far as to say that it is the real bread and butter of this set. In addition, I’d also comfortably declare that the mids come across like the luminous & resplendent centerpiece of the tuning. I hear very contoured and sculpted presence in this range. Energetic but contained, vivacious but measured & reserved, and completely unsullied from the lowest of the mids to the peak of the pinna rise. The midrange is forward leaning, semi-rich and authoritative when it needs to be. Every note sounds fixed and carved, centered and authentic, with an anterior position in the sound field. I’ve been struck many times, eyes closed, head back and soaking in my music, leaving my critical listening responsibilities for another day. Now, I don’t want to oversell here, but I also don’t want to misrepresent what my ears hear. Without a doubt in my mind there are less expensive sets which pull off a clean, clinical, and also musical midrange. I can name many of them. Fantastic sets for half the cost. However, the SuperMix 5 has this ethereal transparency as harmonic overtones uncover breathy vocals as well as subtle nuances without sounding dry or abrasive. Also, cohesiveness on the SuperMix 5 is its calling card as it contradicts the usual pitfalls of multi-driver hybrid iems with its well-tuned and phase aligned marriage of drivers and feathered-in transitions. 

No rough edges

This is a smooth type of sound, no rough edges, no sharp angles. It’s all rounded corners with wavelike note perimeters and precise lineations to every one of those notes. Musicality and technical accuracy are usually like oil and water. However, the SuperMix 5 defies that common understanding. Of course, every track is different, and some may make me a liar, but I can’t help but report that the midrange on the SuperMix 5 is foundational and mellifluous. Crisp when it needs to be crisp, always fine-lined, and with plenty of brightly hued vibrance. Sure, the mids have their subjective gripes that some may have. I can name a few “issues”, if that’s what you want to call them. However, at some point you have to call a spade a spade and appreciate something good when you hear it. Whether it perfectly suits you or not. Simgot chose two large volume BA’s to compose the midrange with a clear and clean level of resolution that’s close to tops in class. The bass doesn’t even hint at mudding up the mix and doesn’t even try to create a veil as very little bass bleed spills over into the mids. The mids are what I’d call neutral, no tone-color enhancement from leached bass or treble. The greatest enhancement of the midrange comes from the use of quality drivers as well as the implementation of the bone-conduction driver. Without question the BC driver adds a definite presence boost, a body boost, and midrange notes don’t sound overtly widened or smeared. Notes are semi-rich, bodied, and full, with great separation between those notes. Even with the slight lack of upper treble lift. 

Lower-Midrange 

Now, the lower midrange isn’t what I’d call a thick or rich region. Typically, I do wish for a more bodied and weighted sound which helps male vocalists to sound more prominent and authoritative. Like I said, the bass doesn’t really bleed in as I usually enjoy. However, the lower midrange on the SuperMix 5 takes a different route to the same goal as there definitely is a richness to the sound as the BC driver aids this neutral toned frequency with a textured and tactile density that is rich in clarity helping instruments and males to sound rigid and embossed. Perhaps not to the liking of everyone, and not nearly as warmed as some may like, but I have listened to many male vocalists who truly sounded wonderful. Like Alex Warren in “Heaven Without You” who’s voice protrudes with presence, rounded, and just prominent enough to sound distinct against the melody which surrounds those vocals. I hear this time and time again. Certainly, it’s a question of taste, and so I don’t look down on any differing opinion. But for me, the lower mids sound controlled, detailed, glass-lined, and eurythmic. There are some dense male vocalists who could use a bit weightier beef, like the low register notes sung by David Draimen of Disturbed in the track “The Sound of Silence”, or bass singer Avi Kaplan in “First Place I Go”. However, this is hardly an issue due to the BC Drivers ability to sound palpably rich in texture. Somewhat making up for the slight lack of warmth. 

Upper-Midrange 

Now, the upper midrange definitely sits more forward with a very vivid and poised elegance. Nothing is every shouty folks. Maybe for those who are very sensitive to pinna gains, but I have yet to wince like I have with so many sets. Of course, I’m. Not sensitive to a brighter hue either. Still, the upper mids do have some luminous tones which will brighten the tonal palette provided by those dual BA’s I was talking about. I don’t hear blatant and uncontrolled sibilance, and I don’t hear the common metallic artifacts which trail many balanced armature drivers. No sir, this upper midrange has a natural-bright sound just missing what I’d call “organic” by a slight margin. It’s energetic without the sharp edge and wonderfully detailed without the overt dryness. Females like Adele sound moistened in “Hello” with her husky voice sounding bold and gracefully pronounced. Or an alto/mezzo-soprano style vocalists like Caitlyn Smith in the track “High” can sound so nicely airy, with a breathy immediacy to her clean vocals. Yet in the same track she also comes across resounding when she belts her heart out during the chorus. Furthermore, during that chorus the SuperMix 5 sounds composed for a passage of music so complicated. No smearing, and no graininess, and every note is accounted for. I’ll repeat what I said earlier, the SuperMix 5 may not match your preferences, but it’s obvious that it is good at what it was tuned to do. 

Downsides to the Midrange 

There are so many folks who really don’t want a set which relies on a bone-conduction driver to provide the rich flavoring. So many of my friends much more enjoy that measured bass bleed cascading just enough to add body and warmth. Many folks much more desire a midrange which has that blatant musicality. No doubt some dense guitar moments can sound as though they lack body. The same goes for deeper male vocals. Also, many folks want something more traditionally organic, plusher, more velvet. I definitely get that, and I understand it well. However, I also can be easily sold when I hear something good. After reviewing for so long I’ve been conditioned to hear the good when it’s there. That may not be the best quality to have as a reviewer all the time. On the flip side it may be a quality which has kept me around. Two sides to every coin. I could also add that in overly bright recordings the upper mids can sound a hair dryer than I’d like. However, timbre remains natural overall, and I think the SuperMix 5 does a whole lot of good rather than bad. 

Treble Region 

Now we get to the treble region, the highs. The highs are provided by a micro-planar driver which was tuned to prioritize organic style timbre over refulgent-brilliance. I think it’s clear that Simgot must have wanted to tune the SuperMix 5 in such a way to correct some of the minor issues that some reviewers and hobbyists spoke not-so-well about. Now, I wouldn’t call the treble tuning of the SuperMix 5 an over-correction, but this treble is certainly less edgy. One of the SuperMix 4’s best qualities (in my opinion) was that razor edge bite that the PZT driver had. Sure, at times it was a bit metallic and splashy, but it was, and still is, very satisfying with so many instruments. On the SuperMix 5 I hear a slight lack of upper treble extension and air. It isn’t totally gone, but it’s simply a less sparkle inducing sound. Still emphasized and brilliant enough for any genre, and I certainly wouldn’t call the treble dark. Just a hair rolled off. It’s something that 98% of listeners won’t even pay attention to. Unless you too are listening to the secondary harmonics of the cymbals on Weezer’s wonderful and expressive cover of “Mr. Blue Sky”. They don’t sound mute, and they don’t sound clipped, but they do sound less pronounced. I hope that makes sense to you. 

Crispness? 

Crispness is very well present when a track calls for it…yet is tempered. The subtle roll-off in the upper treble (past 10k) most certainly produces a less sparkly percussive snap and shimmery harmonic. However, the timbre in the treble is convincingly lifelike, with adequate note body and an organic timbre for both voices as well as instrumentation. In truth, I find that cymbals sound more lifelike and realistic as they come across with much less artificial sparkle in their crash, as they decay with less intensity. Again, the SuperMix 5 has some bite, it has some edge, and some definite clean-lined clarity with a very detailed approach to this region, but you don’t have the radiant sizzle. The bite is controlled, not diffused or absent. Milder you could say. The SuperMix 4 had more sizzle, rawer crunch, with more sprightly and zippy highs. However, the SuperMix 5 is much less splashy too with less treble smearing on complicated treble passages. 

Polished Glow 

However, this is the extent of my issues with the treble because I really enjoy how Simgot tuned this region in accordance with the rest of the spectrum. I hear plenty of brilliance and fatigue-free organic luminance to sound heightened in harmonic detail and vivacious dynamism, but never offensive to the ear. It’s actually very well-tuned. Just not perfect. I’m okay with that. It’s energetic and lively but not sibilant, splashy, or harsh. Not quite as edgy and punchy, but still textured and clean. If I were to sum up the treble, I’d say it sounds natural above all else. It comes across like a very polished and clarity boosted glow rather than a strident and effulgent beam of radiance. Air effects can breathe, with a gently luminous vividness and a glimmering note accentuation for many instruments. In listening, this means that (for instance) violins still have bite, but they won’t sound abrasive. Fundamental tones sound natural as there’s nothing glassy, jagged, or peaky. There are plenty of crisp note definitions for instruments, yet they come across slightly less sharp than I was expecting. Of course, in the same breath, in more energetic treble moments, stuff like cymbal crashes or an electric guitar’s screaming bite may sound a bit polite for some. Or the leading edge on a hi-hat sounding contoured yet not spiky, slightly reserved or less enthused. Now, I like this treble a lot as I’ve gotten very much used to the tuning style and how well the SuperMix 5 ties the sound all together. However, I should add that treble heads… just stop reading because you won’t get what you crave with the SuperMix 5. Unless you like reading about products that won’t interest you. Lol. 

Technically able

Okay, now that I’ve beaten that dead horse to death, I want to also describe to you the technical abilities of the SuperMix 5’s treble region. First off, detail retrieval is pretty clear and easy enough to discern. What you won’t have is an attempt at artificially boosting the treble in hopes of some forced resolution. Resolution within the SuperMix 5’s treble region comes by way of good drivers and a solid overall tuning with no real masking of sounds coupled with snappy transients and distinct space between distinct notes. Details are more authentically produced. In fact, that’s the story about this treble as a whole. Simgot made sure to heighten resolution only enough to preserve a natural timbre, avoid harshness, and they added enough overall brilliance to balance the spectrum. Nothing more and nothing less. To me the treble is a team player, a part to a whole, a very good supporting actor and never the point of focus in my listening. Having said all of that, detail retrieval is still very easy to pinpoint. Note separation is clearly defined, and the micro-planar’s speed is fully evident as it clears space to illuminate nuances, harmonic overtones, and a black background between notes along with solid spatial cues. There’s nothing hazy about this treble and generally nothing from the tuning aspect which would attenuate, mask, or veil those nuances. Even in complex tracks it is fairly easy to catch micro-details if you are seeking them out. So, the technical ability of the SuperMix 5’s treble region is very capable and certainly a pro for this set. In the end, you either jive with this tuning, or you don’t. I’m on team jive. 

Downsides to the Treble Region 

I think we know all of the supposed “shortcomings” that some people may have with the treble region. I pretty much just went over them all at length. However, I will reiterate those “issues” once more. So, first off, to anyone expecting an upgraded treble in the same style of the SuperMix 4, well, you will be sadly unimpressed. The SuperMix 5 is not the SuperMix 4. If Simgot would’ve given this set a different name and let it stand on its own with no anticipation from the consumer, then I don’t think it would have been a downside at all. I like the treble. In no way do I feel it falls short, and I don’t think it’s badly tuned, at all. It’s actually quite good yet with small preferential downsides. That’s it. So, there is a slight lack of sparkly and air induced extension. I don’t want to call it a “roll-off” past 10k, but there’s a roll-off past 10k. I have a sneaky suspicion that this was in response to the critics of the SM4. Well, Simgot succeeded in creating a moderately brilliant and highly capable treble that is not in any way harsh, sibilant, or spiky. Certain reverb trails may be missing or upper treble harmonics, and really there is a lack of that ethereal lift that a high-quality treble focus can provide. Let’s face it, Simgot put a priority on smoothness and fatigue-free timbre over radiant dazzle and liveliness. To some this may sound too reserved. While I won’t say that the SuperMix 5 “lacks” treble bite, there is a slight softening of aggressive crashes or the highly satisfying metal edge on a sweet electric guitar. Stuff like that. Again, I’ve beaten this dead horse quite a bit and I do hope it helps the reader. All things considered, the treble is a good part of a solid whole. Just, treble heads may want to sit this one out. 

Technicalities 

Soundstage 

To me the soundstage of the SuperMix 5 is one of the highlights of this set. There’s a definite immersive quality to the stage which enables the sound to come across very full. Now, I do find that the stage has a more intimate portrayal of the sound field, in that it is slightly more forward rather than cavernous and pushed back. I happen to enjoy this type of presentation. The width is actually about average. I wouldn’t say it is overly wide and expansive in that way. At most it’s just-above-average. Some tracks will sound wider and some more constrained. Obviously. However, the SuperMix 5 has very solid height and very solid depth of field. This is what makes this soundstage as good as it is and immersive as it is and it’s in this way that the sound field comes across expansive. One of the qualities of this stage is in its fantastic layering abilities. I should also point out that the BC driver adds unquestionable depth by providing subtle vibrational feedback which almost brings on a heightened feel of atmospheric volume. This isn’t something which adds left to right width, but it adds dimensionality which I would certainly call holographic. I find that it is an improvement from the SuperMix 4. 

Separation / Imaging 

I think you already have an idea of what I am going to say here. Folks, the SuperMix 5 has a very crystalline sound with tight transients in every region. It has a very clean and balanced sound with no area of the mix masking, no bass creating veil, no treble tizz smearing the mix and the BC driver isn’t so prominent that it widens notes too broadly. Once again, these drivers are high quality and fast coupled with clean space between notes and a black background. I should note that this space is created from the clean tuning, the clarity, as well as the moderately lifted treble (to an extent). Add to that its precise four-way crossover which does a marvelous job of doling out which drivers control which frequencies and doing so in such a cohesive manner. It’s just clean. Note separation is certainly very good. Also, Imaging is one of the SuperMix 5’s true strengths. I’d say that without question the SuperMix 5 will be prolific for gamers and those who greatly enjoy placing instrumentation in a realistic and authentic way. The SuperMix 5 offers a precise multi-layered sound that never comes across congested to my ears. I should mention that the SM4 did a slightly better job in separation within the midrange and treble regions, while the timbre, coherency, and musicality are more in line with the SM5. Still very good in these areas though.

Detail Retrieval 

I find that the Simgot SuperMix 5 is well able to uncover and properly highlight both macro and micro-details with relative ease and without sounding dry or analytical at all. Like I said many times, the SuperMix 5 is a very musical sounding set in a non-traditional way with equally wonderful technical skills. This is what makes this set as good as it is. Dynamic shifts and big orchestral swells sound well layered. String plucks, finger slides, breath in mics, the person laughing in the front row of your favorite live track, along with any minute and subtle bit of minutiae really does sound illuminated better than many sets. Above average for sure, but slightly less distinct from the SM4 which is more clinical and illuminated. The cool thing about the SuperMix 5 is that details and contoured notes don’t sound etched and dry. I’m telling you, Simgot’s ability to tune in such a coherent way using good drivers and a high-quality crossover unit and such a nicely tuned balance of the spectrum adds a sense of melodic fluidity, dynamism, along with those micro-details I’ve been talking about sound very nice to the ear. Nice work Simgot!

Comparison

Simgot SuperMix 4 ($150)

The Simgot SuperMix 4 (SM4) was the one comparison that I desperately needed and wanted to complete. At any rate, the SM4 is without question one of the most adored iems under $200. It still holds up as one of the best that money can buy if it aligns with your preferences. Not many sets can claim a four-driver quadbrid configuration under $200. In fact, is it the only one? Anyway, I reviewed the SM4 (SM4 Review) in July of 2024 and basically called it the best hybrid set anywhere near its price point. Oddly enough I would still call it that. The SM4 boasts 1DD, 1BA, 1PL, and 1PZT, which are four very different driver techs that Simgot quietly ushered out onto the market. It was the people who heard the SM4 who weren’t at all quiet. Instantly it became a classic. It’s because of that legend status that the SuperMix 5 (SM5) was so anticipated by the audio populace. Hence why I’m comparing the two right now. Let’s take a look at some of the differences. 

Non-sound stuff

The first thing you’ll notice is that the SM5 is a hair larger than the SM4 and may present a bigger challenge for smaller ears. Also, as much as I loved the uniquely minimalist design of the SM4 (highly debatable), I love the design and aesthetic of the SM5 even more. Definitely an upgrade there. I also find that both sets come with good accessories, nice enough cable, good carrying case (SM5 is better), though the SM5 comes with more eartips. Also, I find the fit to be a hair better on the SM4, though neither are bad at all. They both fit my ears well, they’re both very lightweight, and both sets are basically fatigue free when wearing for long periods. Now, the most glaring differences are the different driver configuration. Both sets are very ambitious for even the most seasoned tuners and sound engineers, but they are different to an extent. The SM4 once again has 1DD, 1BA, 1PL & 1PZT while the SM5 has 1DD, 2BA’s, 1BC, & 1MP. So, they’re different in that way which would usually lend to a slightly different sound. Lastly, the SM5 is quite a bit more money to purchase at $219 against the cost of the older SM4 at $149 respectively. 

Sound Differences 

The main sound difference is in just about every area of the mix. I find that the SM5 is more like its own set rather than a continuation of the series. I feel that only the driver tech maintains its status as part of the SuperMix series. However, Simgot totally refined the sound, made it more cohesive, more balanced, less V-shaped, less intense, and more mature across the board. Also, the SM5 is much more natural with better and more realistic timbre. Granted, both sets are tuned after the Harman 2019 sound. I really don’t feel that they both align in real world listening though. To start, the bass of the SM4 is much beefier, more fun, still clean, but less defined. The SM5 is simply less enhanced in this area with less sublevel rumble and mid-bass weight. The midrange on the SM5 is much smoother, cleaner, more melodic, less edgy and less pronounced in brighter hues with even thinner low-mids and a more forward upper-mids. I find that the SM5 has better vocals, more natural timbre and more of a realistic and holographic sound field, though it has slightly less distinct detail retrieval than the SM4. Definitely an upgrade there. Now, the SM4’s treble is sprightlier, more brilliant, better extended, with more clean treble bite, crispness, and punch. The SM5 is smoother, more reserved, and less intense altogether up top. Basically, the SM5 is more balanced against the V-shaped sound of the SM4. Detail retrieval is still better on the SM4 (SM5 is very good). Also, note separation is slightly better on the SM4 (man it’s close). But imaging is more precise and more multi-layered on the SM5. Though the SM4 is also very good at imaging the sound field and great at its price. Lastly, the soundstage of the SM5 has a taller, deeper, and more immersive feel with more of an atmospheric sense to it. 

Final thoughts on this comparison 

Well, the SM5 is not what I thought we’d get, but it’s definitely more refined. No, it isn’t a direct upgrade to the same tuning style, but it’s an upgrade in tuning skills in respect to both of their sound signatures. Now, is it worth the extra cost. Well, sure, for the person who wants that more mature sound. However, for the person who much rather would have the deep bass, the sparkly highs, and the crispness of the SM4… probably not. It’s a battle of preferences folks. Now, I have loved the SM4 for a long time and it’s been a regular in my personal rotation for well over a year now and so I’m not willing to say it’s worse than the SM5. I will say that the SM5 is better at a lot of things and the SM4 is also better at a few things as well. Both represent their tuning styles very well. But they are certainly tuned differently. However, if this is what Simgot is going to do with this series then I’m all for it. Not necessarily upgrading one particular tuning style but instead creating different tunings with better drivers. I cannot wait to see what’s next from this series. 

Last Words on the Simgot SuperMix 5 

I’ve had a blast with this review folks. I went from disappointment to the realization that Simgot is quite special and the SuperMix 5 is a very well done iem. Like I said, brain burn had to take effect and I had to mute my anticipated desires for a set that would be a continuation of what made the SM4 so special. Instead Simgot went and made something equally as special in respect to its tuning and price point. I have grown to absolutely adore the sound. No doubt the SuperMix 5 will be in my rotation for the foreseeable future right along with the SM4 and a handful of other sets that I totally enjoy for different reasons. One of the questions that I had going onto this is the same question that I always have for every review. That is, “Is the SuperMix 5 going to stand tall next to the competition”? Well, that is a totally loaded question full of nuance and is a matter of taste. To one the answer may be no, and to another the answer will be an emphatic yes. For me, I think that the SuperMix 5 is one of the better iems that come with a balanced sound and certainly will be in the top of anyone’s list for that style of tuning. Let’s face it, there are so many styles, and this hobby is so subjective, that saying the SuperMix 5 is the best in the price point would be foolish and inaccurate for many people. That said, there is no denying how talented this set is. It is prolific in so many regards that I couldn’t possibly declare it not worth the cost. The SuperMix 5 is worth the $219 that Simgot is asking for and perhaps it also carries a high level of price to performance too. 

The Why… 

Because the SuperMix 5 has one of the most unique driver configurations of any set, anywhere. To add to that, Simgot somehow made this set more cohesive than most any set in its range. Which is saying a lot. Now, the build is very nice in that Simgot used quality resin 3D printed very well with aviation grade aluminum faceplates along with being extremely light in weight. Great for long sessions for a number of reasons but most assuredly because it offers no wear fatigue. Also, the aesthetic is so cool. I love the all-black design language with the simple logo on the faceplates. It is such a handsome set and so simple too. The packaging and accessories are not bad at all, great OFC silver-plated modular cable, classy carrying case, and eartips which make sense for this set. However, it’s no surprise that the real worth of this set comes from the sound quality. 

That Sound! 

The Simgot SuperMix 5 has such a clean balance that there’s really nothing that blurs the mix whatsoever. I’m mean… nothing. I am so impressed by how homogenized, congruent, and totally cohesive all of the five drivers are. Every transition sounds like a single DD in that they are all perfectly feathered in from one driver/frequency to the next. Truly a wonderful job. I also love how Simgot made such a smooth character, refined performer, with a musically adept sound that is highly technical without sounding analytical and clinical. It is so satisfying for so many reasons. The sound is very much unsullied, exceptionally clean and clear with top class resolution and clarity to illuminate every finite detail. The SuperMix 5 has a holographic stage, great dimensionality, along with spectacular layering abilities of that stage. Details come through with ease, Imaging is spot-on, and every note sounds distinct, realistic, and very well separated from the next note. The bass is fast, well defined, layered, and has great texture for a moderately lifted low-end. The midrange has a very tactile, palpable, and rich sound that comes across full and very much vibrant without any glare. I love violinists with the SuperMix 5, and instruments come through very authentically on this set as well. The treble is non-offensive, moderate in its brilliance, but tactfully precise with nice body, reserved bite and fantastic space between notes along with clean layers of sound. Honestly, the SuperMix 5 presents a fantastic option for anyone who desires that mature sound. Absolutely it is worth every penny and it’s an easy rec. 

Conclusion 

To conclude my full review of the Simgot SuperMix 5, I first have to thank the very nice people of Simgot for thinking of me and thinking of mobileaudiophile.com. I have once again had a great time spending with the SuperMix 5, and I am very pleased with this set. I can’t thank you enough Simgot. Also, I must thank the reader today, that’s you. Thank you so very much for choosing this review and choosing mobileaudiophile.com. Always my greatest hope is that this review helps you in some way in your journey to finding the audio product which suits you the best. Thank you so very much. 

Other Perspectives

As always, I also have to make sure that I at least try to persuade you to check out other reviews. We want you to get this purchase right and we want it to make sense for both your enjoyment as well as your pocketbook. Like I said earlier, we are all different, and the guy sitting right next to me may feel I’m crazy for enjoying this set while the guy on the left may be in total agreement. Everyone is different folks. One of the most obvious aspects of this hobby that I’ve learned is that we all actually have the capacity to hear differently. Even more important, we have different preferences. It is always important to check out as many thoughts about a product as possible. However, remember that just like every hobbyist is different, so is every reviewer. The point is, it would certainly give you an advantage to check out as many thoughts and opinions as possible on the Simgot SuperMix 5. With that, I think I’m done. Please take good care, stay as safe as possible and always… God Bless