Dunu Kima 2 Review
Intro
Hello, this review and feature covers the latest from the audio brand Dunu named the Dunu Kima 2. The Kima 2 follows a couple of its already well accomplished predecessors in their 2022 model, the Dunu Kima (Kima Review) as well as the Dunu Kima Classic (Kima Classic Review). I gotta say, I was, and still am, a fairly large fan of the series for their natural and very organic take on my music. Really a clean sound across the board on the Kima original, yet it was missing some weight in the low-end. It was missing some energy in the upper portions. Some would call it a very “blah” sounding set. I disagree, but that’s me. Dunu’s answer for that “meh” sound came in the form of the Kima Classic, which added some bite, some low-end oomph and simply a more fun sound. Both sets are very well tuned iems at the $100 price point. Both sets were pretty complete packages as well. However, there were still improvements which needed attention and Dunu set out to attend to those changes on this latest Kima 2.
Dunu
Dunu Audio is one of those brands which effectively releases a product, and the entire hobbyist community collectively turns to see what it is. Really a very well-respected name in the hobby. Dunu is not one of those brands seeking their next buck. You can tell there is passion involved in their products by the fact that they only release a product when the proper amount of R&D has been accomplished and when that product is ready. This is an important point that I hope doesn’t get overlooked. So many brands spit out products like they are on an assembly line anymore. Dunu puts the tough work in, to craft and create products that they can be proud of as well as products that the hobbyist community will ultimately enjoy. Not many brands have crafted as many legendary type sets as Dunu. The Zen series, the Falcon series, the SA6 series, the Kima series, and on, and on, and on. The point being, Dunu takes their work seriously, with a ton of expertise on hand. Just so you know the pedigree of the Kima series.
Will it hold up?
I suppose the last thing I need to find out is how well does the Kima 2 hold up against not just those iems in its same series, but also against all of those iems within its price point. That’s the real question after all. We only care about getting the best we can for our dollar. Let’s face it, there truly is a mountain of solid iems vying for your money. The hobby has gotten so convoluted of late, a new set every week promising to revolutionize your listening experience. Coincidentally, the $100 price point just so happens to be the most hotly fought-over, sought-after, and is one of the most viciously contested price points within the hobby. Really, I’d say the range begins at $75 to about $150. In that range you’ll see brands pulling some major breakthroughs. This price point is the 1st steppingstone for hobbyists. Getting past that $100 barrier. Iems get better made, better accessorized, and actual R&D is committed to these iems which mostly results in better drivers, cavities, etc. along with better tech, which may lead to better tuning and ultimately, if they’ve done their homework… better sound. I won’t bore you (as I have in the past) and go through all of the sets which fight over dominance of this price point. But I will say that the Kima 2 has to be good. It has to bring something to the table folks that isn’t regurgitated for the hundredth time.
Weeding through the hype…
My Pops told me that no matter where you are, whatever venture you go into, the cream will always rise to the top. As many hype trains that exist in this audio game, it’s true that the hobby has a way of weeding through the initial hype and only the most valued, most unique, and most worthy iems stand the test. Those are the sets we talk about six months after release. I am very curious if Dunu has built upon the Kima series, to be what it was always supposed to be. One of the best. With that, the Dunu Kima 2 everyone…
Non-Affiliated Purchasing Links:
Kima 2 Pros
-Exquisite build, all-alloy, light, premium
-Such a slick looking series of iems. The Kima 2 is a looker
-The unboxing is one of the best in the price point
-Fantastic Lyre cable
-Almost perfect tonal balance
-Completely natural timbre
-Highly resolute sound, very clean across the board
-Fast, punchy bass
-Wonderful midrange, completely tuneful, great for vocalists
-Non-fatiguing treble, balanced, just brilliant enough
-Detail Retrieval is solid
-Separation & imaging
-Spacious sound field
Kima 2 Cons
-Bassheads, even moderate bassheads will want more bass emphasis
-Warm/dark lovers will not enjoy the Kima 2
Gear used for testing
–iBasso DX240 with Amp8 MK2
Packaging / Accessories
Unboxing
The Dunu Kima 2 arrived at my home in a medium sized square box. The artwork is the first thing you’ll notice. A gorgeous anime artistic rendering of a young girl, reading a book? With doves flying around? I don’t know what this graphic is supposed to mean, but it’s a very imaginative picture with some great colors. Anyways, that’s on the sleeve to the box. Take off the sleeve and you’ll see a regular black box with “Dunu” imprinted in the center. Take off the lid and you’ll see the “anime stand”? Of sorts. Some sort of anime decoration for a desk or something? I don’t know folks. Anyways, under that you’ll see the Kima 2 sitting comfortably in foam cut-outs. Take off that layer and underneath you’ll see the carrying case. Open the case and inside is the cable, the multitude of eartips, a 3.5-6.35mm adapter, a small cloth bag, as well as the 3.5 and the 4.4 modular adapters. You’ll also notice an iem cleaning tool & a cable clip. Really a full package from Dunu once again. One thing that Dunu never seems to skimp on is the packaging and accessories.
Eartips
Now, Dunu provides a ton of eartips. That’s 13 pairs of eartips in total across four differ rent styles of tips. I have to salute Dunu as all of the eartips provided are actually quite good tips. Let’s start with three pairs (S, M, L) of black silicone “Vocal Enhancement” eartips with a blue rigid stem and a narrow bore. The next tips are also a black/dark gray silicone “Atmospheric” eartips with a red stem which come in three pairs (S, M, L) and also have a narrow bore. Next are the awesome Dunu’s Candy Tips. They provide three pairs (S, M, L) and also come with a narrower bore. I love the Candy Tips with thier flexible flange and stem. Lastly, Dunu puts into the package four pairs (S, M, L, XL) of Dunu S&S eartips. The S&S tips have a wider bore and are certainly some fantastic tips to have around. You never know when you’ll need them. However, I chose to actually go with the Dunu large sized candy tips. They fit like a glove, nice and rigid enough flange and they seal wonderfully for me. Thankfully, Dunu quite literally provides a mountain of tips, and each is different in how they present the sound. Really great package folks. Each of the types of tips provided are solid tips which can be used at some point, with some set. Great for a collection.
Carrying Case
Now, the carrying case that Dunu adds into the package is actually great. Really a gorgeous case. It’s a large white fabric hard case with a working zipper that’s very chic, stylish, and altogether just a classy inclusion for $100. Please trust me, you don’t usually see a case as nice as this one. On the top of the case, you’ll notice “DUNU” Indented directly in the center of it. Again, stylish, classy. I’d say the case is plenty large enough for your earphones, cable, adapters, eartips, and possibly a small dongle dac. Great for throwing into a bag. Not so great for putting into a pocket. Unless you want to look like you are happy to see… everyone. Sorry, I had to. Anyways, the case is a great inclusion folks. Dunu does nothing cheaply and always seeks to impress. Nice work in that one Dunu.
Cable
This brings us to the cable. Folks, no set of earphones is complete without a solid cable. However, that cable NEEDS to nail three features and functions. Any cable needs to look nice aesthetically. It has to look nice folks. C’mon! Next, the cable has to be made of materials which play well “sonically” with the earphones provided. Lastly, it’s always better when the cable is not impossible to roll up without blowing apart. Okay, fitment means something too, of course that may be different for everyone. However, those are the main attributes needed in my mind. Thankfully the Dunu Lyre lookalike modular cable provided is a gorgeous gray wire with a nylon fabric insulation. To be exact, it’s a 2-pin, four-core monocrystaline copper and silver-plated monocrystaline copper cable which comes equipped with a 3.5 single ended as well as 4.4 balanced Q-Lock adapters. Basically, the adapters get lined-up and pushed on while a metal threaded fitting threads onto the cable holding it securely. I’d say it’s one of the better implementations of modular adapters. Especially at this price. Also, I feel that the cable does the Kima 2 justice sonically. I tried a silver cable, please don’t do that. Learn from me. I tried a fully copper cable too, which almost dulled the midrange. Honestly, the included cable sounded awesome from all of these other cables that I have on hand to try. What I’m trying to say is; fantastic job Dunu! You provided us a cable which actually makes sense paired with the Kima 2.
Build / Design / Internals / Fit
Build Quality
This will be short because it is so very apparent that the Kima 2 is built magnificently. Friends, I feel that one of the best materials that exists to use for an earphone shell is stainless steel. Well, that is exactly what Dunu used for the Shells on the Kima 2. Of course, the Kima 2 is a hair heavier at 10.2 grams. As they should be. That said, 10 grams is hardly heavy. As far as size, the Kima 2 is about average sized, not too big and not small. The shells are cut in a way that hugs the ear nicely, a very cool shape which is functional and nice to look at. So, the shells are actually sandblasted to leave a semi-faded surface finished off with a dull polish that really looks nice. In fact, the shape of the faceplates is actually crafted to create shadows. You’ll notice two vents, one on the back cavity and one on the front. The nozzles are plated in what appears to be brass. Just a gorgeous contrast. The nozzles are right around 6mm (give or take) and actually fit somewhat deeply. At least in my ears they do. The fit is wonderful, but I’ll cover that later. At any rate, the build is top class, top shelf, and premium, any way you turn them.
Design
Let’s talk about the design language of the Dunu Kima 2. To be totally honest, not much has changed from the Kima original or the Kima Classic. You still have the “K” across the faceplates. Yes, the same “K” which was crafted to create intricate shadows bringing upon a 3D element into the design. The all-silver semi-polished look is without question one of the best designs in the price point. Add to that the brass or gold-plated nozzle and you have yourself one of the best designed earphones that $100 can buy. It’s no wonder Dunu decided not to change the design up too much. Why would they change a good thing? I personally loved the design of both the OG Kima and the Classic, so it’s no surprise that I equally enjoy the Kima 2’s design language. For what it’s worth, Dunu is also seeing their limited-edition Kima 2 which comes in a crazy beautiful high polish green. The Limited Edition is limited to #999 units, so act fast on that one. As for me, I like the Kima 2 as it is. I love the semi-polish silver stainless steel. It is such a nice design. Well, done, once again Dunu.
Internals
The Dunu Kima 2 is a single dynamic driver earphone which consists of one “New-Generation” 10mm diamond-like-carbon (DLC) composite dome diaphragm driver with what Dunu states has a different material for the suspension. Dunu also states that the deposition process of coating the driver with the DLC compound is much better now. They say there is less gaps, less surface defects too. This can only improve the sound at the end of the day. Beyond the drivers, Dunu decided to use the same high-power magnetic architecture as was used in the very popular Dunu Falcon Ultra. It appears that Dunu really wanted this set to sound amazing for the cost and seemed to spare no expense in making sure that was the end result.
Fit / Comfort
Now fit and comfort is completely subjective and a very personal thing to speak on. Like, I have zero idea if the Kima 2 will or won’t fit your ears. All I can say is that the Kima 2 fit me very well. Once I got the tips which worked for me, that is. It did take long though as any of the tips provided in the packaging worked like a charm. The Co fort is great, you don’t even feel the 10-gram shells in your ears as the weight is dispersed very well. Honestly, to me the Kima 2 is a homerun from a fit standpoint. That’s me though. How they will fit you is anyone’s guess.
Drivability / Pairings
Output Power
The Dunu Kima 2 is rated with an impedance of right around 20 ohms and a sensitivity of about 108 db/mw (@1khz). What this translates to is that the Kima 2 is a very sensitive iem which can run well off of lower powered sources. Even on a simple smartphone, iPad, cheap Amazon 3.5 dongles, really any low powered source the Kima 2 was able to get to good volume with plenty of headroom. That said, I feel that some more raw power does help to bring the Kima 2 to its pinnacle sound fidelity. I’m not talking about a million watts either. Let’s put it this way, high gain on the EPZ TP50 was wonderful. I’m sure low gain would be just fine too. But who likes low gain? Yuck. Anyways, without a doubt the mix tightens up, adds more vibrance, slightly more sculpted bass region, better extended upper treble with more body to that region. Of course, I should also add that my higher-powered sources are also my most talented sources. So, how much of that improvement comes from simply using a better source, or more power. I think it’s a mix of both. Still, more raw power certainly helps the Kima 2 scale nicely. Still, in the end you really should strive to get a decent Dongle Dac. Something with some juice helps.
Source Pairing
Now we get to one of the most subjective sections in audio. That is “source pairing”. So many reviewers will swear that this set needs this source, or that source. They will say that synergy happens with this, or that. Insert eye-roll emoji. Friends, “synergy” is a made-up word that is supposed to direct the reader or listener to the perfect pairing based on tonality and other features. While synergy has its place, it is not an across the board understanding. I mean, “synergy” really just means; “it sounds good to me”. It’s subjective folks. Person to person can change. So, as far as the synergy that I heard with the Kima 2. In truth, it’s an almost dead neutral iem. Perhaps warm/neutral. Friends, this basically means that almost any source can play them just fine. Be it warmer, warm/neutral, neutral, bright/neutral, rolled off…whatever, the Kima 2 will sound good. Now, does this mean that you will enjoy all of these different source tonality pairings with the Kima 2? No that definitely doesn’t mean that. It’s personal, subjective, person-to-person may feel differently. For me, I like anything from warm to a neutral source. The Kima 2 is so clean that it can cooperate with most any source pairing and sound great. That’s why neutral iems are so nice. Of course everything has its downsides, but for a dead neutral iem, usually tonality pairing is not one of them.
What do you need?
You only really need something with at least a 3.5 single ended port to plug the Kima 2 into. However, to get the most out of this beautiful iem I would certainly suggest that you try to get a decently powerful dongle dac. 150mW at 32ohms is more than enough, which is basically any and all dongle dacs above $40. In fact, most dongle dacs will provide twice that anymore. At any rate, get a decent dongle dac, that you enjoy the sound and performance of, and you should be good to go. Who knows though, you may like something a hair warmer, or cooler. It’s a process folks.
Sound Impressions
*Note: I want to preface this section with a few things. First, I gave the Kima 2 about five days of burn-in playing loops of white noise, pink noise, tones & sweeps, and different tunes specifically meant to settle the driver in certain areas. Did this help? Honestly, I have no idea. I really didn’t pay enough attention early on to tell a difference and nothing stood out to me that needed changing when I 1st listened. So, I don’t know if it helped, but I definitely performed it. I listen almost entirely to flac or better files stored on my many devices. Also, I listen mainly to the UAPP (USB Audio Player Pro) music player as well as Hiby Music Player and Poweramp from time to time. Each music player has its own strengths, and I use them all.
Neutral / Natural
The Dunu Kima 2 comes across very close to dead neutral to my ears, maybe warm/neutral too. I wouldn’t argue about either. I absolutely adore what Dunu was able to accomplish with this set, for the cost. Without a doubt in my mind the Kima 2 is most definitely an upgrade from the previous iterations of the Kima series. Granted, those were nice sets, but the Kima 2 has more of a crispness on attack. More of a fundamental bite to notes whilst remaining harmoniously smooth across the board. This set is so clean, so tight, yet wonderfully balanced across the mix. Just an almost perfectly pleasant sound. Friends, I treasure the sound of the Fiio FD15 (FD15 Review) and I can barely tell a difference between the two sets. Okay, there is distinct subtle differences, but that’s besides the point. The point is, for $50 less the Kima 2 is a wonderfully fluid sounding iem with great natural note weight, natural in its transients, natural in its macro-dynamics, in its vibrance, and just about any other sound descriptor. Yes, the Kima 2 has its subtle subjective issues and of course it (along with every other iem) is not going to be everyone’s cup-o’-tea, but man is it a nice sounding set! Simply pleasant folks. I could listen all day long and never grow tired of it. In truth, Dunu could’ve asked for a whole lot more money in exchange for the Kima 2, and I wouldn’t have batted an eye. It’s a very nice sounding set.
How does it sound?
Again, the Kima 2 is very close to neutral with a healthy bump up top, as well as a slight linear bass shelf in which ever-so-gently squeezes itself (in a very polite manner) into the midrange adding a very organic weight and richness to an otherwise very clean sound. I would call this a U-shaped sound signature. The bass hits fast, punchy, relatively deep but is mostly playing second fiddle to the midrange. Without question, the midrange is the bread and butter of the Kima 2. You have an excellent midrange for vocalists. Not too forward, not pushed back, very melodious, and tuneful all the way out. Just enough shimmer, sparkle, and vibrancy. Lastly the treble is almost perfectly balanced with the rest of the mix, to my ears anyways. A very nice, very smooth treble which comes with no real peaks, no sibilance, no odd timbre. Just a nice sounding treble. Detail retrieval is probably just above average, same with instrument separation, and imaging. Good, not great, but also, I wouldn’t change it even if I could. The stage is average, average width, average depth, average height. So no, the Kima 2 is not the picture of technical prowess. It won’t resolve the subtlest of subtleties. It will however sound like pure musicality in the most non-offensive form with an effortless ability to convey my music. Truly a diamond folks. If you didn’t know, it’s wise to pick up diamonds. Just sayin’.
Bass Region
The low-end of the Dunu Kima 2 is what I would refer to as natural. It’s realistic, authentic, organic to life. Yes, it can get reasonably deep in pitch and yes it has some guttural tendencies, but mostly it keeps a perfect balance against the mids and the treble. Nothing about the bass is overdone, or overcooked. So, with that said, the Kima 2 is obviously NOT for bassheads. The low-end is all about quality over quantity and it exemplifies this at all times. I hear a very nicely textured low-end with very nice note definition as well. I also hear a very tactile type of bass punch which provides a nice snap on attack for kick drums etc. No where in the bass do I hear anything remotely bloated, or muddy, and certainly nothing which promotes any sort of veil to the overall sound. Truly this is a very well thought out and nicely tuned bass region that has the ability to hit quickly, with a palpable punch, and a certain dexterity which enables the Kima 2 to sound very precise, with a natural note recovery. Perhaps less full in authority, but very agile, very clean, very natural to my ears.
Sub-Bass
The sublevels of the low-end aren’t going to bring the bass-bois out of the woodwork. This is not the type of sub-bass that’ll rattle your eyeballs, tickle your nose hairs, or realign your brain stem. It thankfully is not anything like that. Again, quality over quantity, with another helping of quality. The sub-bass still has some haptic feel to bass notes when a track presents such a thing. Like the track I always use for my reviews, “Groove” by Ray Wylie Hubbard. It’s a cool fest of jazz infused rumble with an aggressive drone. Any set will sound at least marginally deep and guttural with this song. What I enjoy about the Kima 2 is how well it navigates that low aggressive drone while simultaneously replaying the rest of the mix as though there’s more than one driver. Another track just like that, by The Decemberists, called “Tell Me What’s on Your Mind” is another heavy rumble and bulbous style growl and drone. Once again, every set replays this song with at least a modicum of beastliness. Still, the Kima 2 is amazing once the drums kick in. Again, it’s like there’s more than one driver. The snap on attack of each drum hit comes through loud and clear while the thrumming deep buzz of the bassline creates the foundation of the track. Now, those are tracks which should sound guttural. I also noticed that even most bass guitars have a certain fullness and bite with enough resonant rumble to sound and feel authentic.
Mid-Bass
I have gone back and forth against myself whether the mid-bass has the brunt of the emphasis down low. I would venture to say that it does, but the linearity of this bass shelf is wonderful folks. So, the mid-bass is less intense, not a ton of robust slam. I’m sure it’s enough for 90% of hobbyists, but it won’t make big bass lovers very happy. Though, I think we’ve established that. Once again, the quality of the bass region is what makes this low-end as special as it is. It’s fast enough to take in complicated bass passages yet has enough of a lingering resonance to sound realistic. It’s simply clean. Clean can mean a lot of things but the 1st things I think of are good definition, texture, good resolution, without a ton of residual harmonics, a glass-lined note outline, rather than plush or fuzzy. The mid-bass of the Kima 2 is all of those things. It may not satisfy everyone’s guilty pleasure style bass fantasies, but you can throw almost anything at it and the Kima 2 will perform. Listening to “Get Lucky” by Daft Punk and Pharrell Williams you’ll see right away that the Kima 2 can take on a speedy mid-bass yet at the same time easily separate the surrounding melodies like the strumming guitar, there’s nothing murky, nothing masked, just a clean sounding bass which does the song crazy-good justice rather than steal any clarity. Each bass note hits with some nice precision, it’s tidy, it has some real good density in its less bombastic boom. The cool thing is that the bass is elevated enough to sound meaty. Just a nice bass.
Downsides to the Bass Region
Without a doubt the number one issue that most folks will have is the lack of a big authoritative boom or deep sublevel grumble. Not that it doesn’t present these things sufficiently, but just not enough to come across “big” and “deep” in the traditional bass lover sense. That’s it. What the low-end does really well is show up when it’s called upon. Let’s put it this way, I never hear anything which sounds or feels as though the Kima 2 “lacks”. I don’t get that folks. The low-end holds up its end of the agreement when it’s asked to. See, the bass is not the focus of this iem. I know we are inundated with iems that have a powerful low-end leaving other areas of the mix to slightly suffer. If anything, the Kima 2 could use some more sublevel emphasis. Maybe a touch. However, it would kill me to ruin the sound of this set for a hair more guttural growl. Ya know what… I take that back, don’t touch a thing, I like it just the way it is. Of course, I am not everyone else, and I’m sure that the Kima 2 will not suffice for many folks. It’s just the truth. I said the same thing in the Fiio FD15 Review. If you like natural, ridiculously clean, nicely layered, with some tactility and dense punch then you may love what the Kima 2 has to offer down low. Quality trumps quantity on this set every day of the week.
Midrange
The midrange is the bread-&-butter of the Dunu Kima 2. When I listen to this set all I can think of is how effortless the Kima 2 navigates any track in such a harmonious manner. Really a sweet sounding iem and its midrange is a huge reason for that. There’s no other way to look at the Kima 2. It’s a balanced iem, no one area of the mix steals the focus. However, the crown jewel of that balanced signature happens to be the midrange on the Kima 2. Tuned to be a hair closer, very naturally tuned. The midrange comes across as smooth in its note body, crisp at the edges (when needed) and very clear. Note weight sounds natural, not thin or frail sounding and not overly thick. These attributes set the stage wonderfully for vocalists and for instrumentation to sound open and full, realistic in their inflections, yet melodious at every turn. No color alters the sound one way or the other. See, the bass shelf is not heavily emphasized. In fact, I’d say it’s emphasized just enough. Yet that bass shelf doesn’t flatten out until almost 700hz, which is far into the midrange. I think the result is like I’ve been saying… it has a very realistic tuning. Natural voices, forward yet never boxy, rich yet never overly wide in presence. Just tight enough to decay in a way that cooperates with my natural understanding of what a “thing” actually sounds like. Be it, a vocalist, or be it violin, piano, acoustic guitar, etc. The macro cleanliness and neutrality are such that instruments come across uncolored and preserved allowing their natural sound to come across. If I haven’t said it yet, this is a breath of fresh air folks.
Macro Clarity
The truth is that the Kima 2’s midrange is actually fairly well detailed with a transparent sound, black background, as though all midrange notes have a spotlight pointed right at them. However, in the face of that spotlight, the Kima 2 has this persistent sound balance, which always keeps the sound (as a whole) anchored. Yes, the mids are fantastic, but the beauty of the Kima 2 is in that balance. It allows certain elements of the frequency to stand out where they otherwise may sound a little murkier on other sets. So, you won’t get top-class micro-details and fine-lined precision, what you will get is perfectly clean macro clarity coupled with effortless musicality. Truly a nice midrange folks.
Lower-Midrange
Male vocals sound awesome. Flat-out, hands-down. In my opinion, males come with a very unsullied authority to their voices. Meaning, there is weight to the body of their notes, yet that weight isn’t the type which clouds, veils, or congests the image. There is a richness, some etched-out fullness that draws the male voice forward in an appropriate way. I’m telling you folks; the macro-cleanliness is very nice. For instance, Gary Lightbody in “This is How You Walk On” almost puts Gary’s voice on a pedestal against that rest of the mix. With the Kima 2 in ear, he sounds very distinct, almost engraved within the sound field and against the rest of the melody. Notes are sculpted well enough, but not clinical, they’re textured, but never dry. Now, I could see some folks wishing the Kima 2 had even more rich warmth. I could see that. Despite that, for those who enjoy a cleaner neutral approach that doesn’t skimp on note weight, those are the people the Kima 2 is for. Males, lower register females, and instrumentation all “generally” sound very nice for a $100 iem.
Upper-Midrange
Now, the upper-mids have that nicely gradual pinna rise which peaks below the Harman Target. So already you can tell that the Kima 2 is not going to be as glare inducing as some of those Harman style bad boys. I actually find the upper mids to be the most enthralling frequency range, for me anyways. I like that the upper mids have more than enough sparkle, and shimmer to cap certain instruments, or female voices. To add to that, you still have that nice note body. Now it does thin out a hair in this region, but I’d still refer to the upper midrange as a very natural & neutral sound that’ll present the track as it is, for both instruments & voices too. Truly some of the best timbre that $100 can get you, in my opinion. Really a very gratifying sound. I hear a euphonic, crystalline, very lucid sounding upper portion of the mids combined with a certain buttery and full-bodied sound as well. It’s just wonderful folks. Also, I hear nothing fatiguing. You won’t get hit with any random peaks, no hidden jolts of glare. No sibilance (that is noteworthy) either. Pleasant is still the word which best describes the Kima 2 as a whole, and certainly pleasant describes the upper midrange.
Upper-mids cont…
Now, females are truly set up to shine with the Kima 2. The upper-mids are more forward than the low-mids with subtle touches of extra energy that seems to mesh wonderfully for most female vocalists. Furthermore, the Kima 2 carries this soft glow of controlled vibrance which summits every note. Friends, just do yourself a favor and listen to Adele sing “Easy on Me (Live at the NRJ Awards, 2021)”. It’s a vocal masterpiece from the singer. The Kima 2 is the perfect vehicle to drive her sound. No sharp inflections in Adele’s voice get exaggerated, you hear nothing metallic (which can easily happen). However, what you will hear is that very clean, nicely bodied, and natural timbre softly layered with just the right amount of sparkle. Obviously, these are highly subjective words here, but I just feel that some things in this hobby are pretty much universal.
Fluid/Smooth
Another singer is Sia who emotionally belts out “Nowhere to Be”. Folks, I adore how the Kima 2 can take abrasive voices, more like sharp little micro abrasions that a singer like Sia has cresting every note sung from her mouth. There’s an edge, and this edge can sound… well… edgy. You could say metallic but really, it’s simply not natural to the ear. Some sets will magnify and embellish these little moments. Not the Kima 2. The fluidity and smoothness of the Kima 2 comes across glass lined as it smooths, sands down, and gets the most out of Sia’s vocals in a very liquid way. If that makes sense to you. Not to mention piano, violin, percussion of all sorts, strings of all sorts too, along with every other instrument that I’ve heard played through the Kima 2. It’s the same story; full bodied, rounded, very clear, enough sparkle and shimmer to bring some slight bite and crispness while also sounding very resounding when needed.
Downsides to the Midrange
Now, I don’t want to oversell this set, and I don’t want to make this some hype piece either. No question there have been plenty of iems which can perform in a similar fashion. Namely, the original Kima, the much less expensive HZsound Heart Mirror, the Aful MagicOne, and many others in the price point which can really carry vocals and instruments in a natural and timbre-first way. Do those sets put it all together like the Kima 2? Now that’s a question that deserves some attention. However, of course there are going to be those who simply don’t enjoy this vocal friendly sound. That should go without saying. Also, folks who really love a heavy warmth, an even juicier and richer sound or those who don’t enjoy neutrality will not be enamored with the Kima 2. Most definitely macro-dynamics are not the Kima 2’s calling card either. Yes, there’s energy, but it’s controlled, capped, and never does that energy serve as a sharp contrast sonically. Some may even call the Kima 2 “dull”. I wouldn’t be surprised to see that. Personally, I don’t feel that something which sounds so authentic to life could be “dull”, but also, I’m not you. Coincidentally, it’s you who I’m trying to help here. So no, the mids aren’t perfect. They could use some more hard-lined density, some more focused details, more separation of instrumentation etc. Still, at the end of the day Dunu did a wonderful job in tuning this set.
Treble Region
In a nutshell, the Kima 2’s treble region is fairly safe. Certainly, it has its moments of brilliance and shine, but the Kima 2’s treble is not going to “push the envelope” … so to speak. So, it isn’t an intense treble, or a very dynamic treble. I’d say it’s just brilliant enough and emphasized enough to add some luster to the overall sound. Also, the treble is lifted enough to balance the spectrum wonderfully as the treble is a huge reason for this overall neutral/natural sound. So, while the highs on the Kima 2 aren’t spit-fire, ultra-peppy, or heavily contrasted against the rest of the mix, they’re actually perfect for the Kima 2. I wouldn’t change a thing. Basically, treble heads won’t jump for joy as the Kima 2 will not be the $100 set they crown as “Prince of Treble”. Or those who desire some slight sharpness, some vivacity, or some hard-edged treble bite will likely want to keep looking. In my opinion, Dunu made sure to tune this set with a superlative tonal balance that not many sets priced around $100 are offering these days. Not quite like the Kima 2 anyways. However, to get that balance they did have to sacrifice some dynamic energy in this region. I’m okay with it.
It’s a single DD…
Having said all of that, I still feel that detail retrieval up top is a plus, clarity is still a mainstay for this tuning as well. It is a very clean treble, smoother than crisp, decently extended, and this treble has enough vivid radiance to filter down to the midrange providing some snap on percussion, adding sparkle to the upper mids, enough edge to acoustic strings etc. So, while it may not be the picture of refulgent luminosity, it is not boring or dull and isn’t even close to rolled off or dark. No way. The Kima 2 has the perfect treble emphasis for the Kima 2 and carries enough resplendent candor to add some gloss to this region. Let’s put it that way. Again, details are nice, especially in a macro sense with some micro-details coming through as well. Probably above average in this area. Obviously, that is highly debatable, but I have almost no issues hearing most of the subtle stuff within my music. I’d say that you don’t have a ton of treble bite, with transient swiftness, precise note density, or perfectly contoured & rounded treble notes. There isn’t that haptic style treble that only certain drivers can obtain. This is a $100 iem and it is a single dynamic driver earphone. Just keep that in mind.
Tonal balance trumps technical prowess
What you won’t hear is anything shreikingly sharp or too bright. I really don’t feel that many people are going to feel the Kima 2 has too much brilliance. Maybe for those who only enjoy a dark treble. Everyone else will likely find the Kima 2 right in their comfort zone. It’s an easy listen, non-offensive, nothing shrill to my ears and I don’t hear that tizzy upper treble splash with the secondary harmonics of a cymbal strike. Also, I don’t hear a ton of blending in this area either, except for heavily complicated treble music. On the flipside, for a more exact digital treble like the style of “Magnetic Fields, Pt. 1” by Jean Michel Jarre you will hear that precision, the rounded notes, the bite. That should be expected, even with loads of treble coming at you. The Kima 2 seems to handle that very well. Yet in more chaotic treble tracks with actual woodwind instruments, electric guitar, brass instruments, cello, clarinet, french horn, among others all mishmashing in the treble region as in “Adventure of a Lifetime” by Cold Play, there is some slight blending up top. Tonally the sound is beautiful, but I’d say some of the distinct note separation will leave those treble diehards wanting. So, while the sound is about as harmonious as you can get, it isn’t the most exact and probably isn’t the most polished treble region. Now, does any of that make even a slight difference to me or take away from my enjoyment? Absolutely not. This is certainly a time where I’d say that tonal-balance and good timbre trumps technical proficiency, with ease.
Downsides to the Treble Region
I feel I’ve already covered this in the previous paragraphs. It really all comes down to subjective issues that “some” people “might” have. Again, not for treble heads. I think we’ve established that. Also, you have to keep in mind the price, the driver configuration too. It’s simply true that an under $100 single dynamic driver earphone is not going to replicate the treble region perfectly, with perfect precision, and isn’t going to sculpt every treble note in fine-lined accuracy. Some tracks will make what I just said a liar out of me, but I feel you all understand what I’m saying. Well, I hope you do.
The truth is, I couldn’t say enough good things about the way Dunu crafted and tuned the treble to fit perfectly within the canvas that is the Kima 2. It just works. The tonality and timbre strike a wonderfully organic chord within my mind space when listening. I’ve said the same thing about a few other sets in this price point as well, so the Kima 2 is not something I haven’t heard before. However, it is a quality attribute of this set which shouldn’t go unspoken of or ignored. It’s a quality treble which may not be the picture-perfect model of a technical treble. I think I’ve beat this horse to death; you get the idea.
Technicalities
Soundstage
Beginning with the soundstage, I find the Kima 2 to give an average portrayal of the sound field. Thankfully you don’t have a small stage, or a congested stage and so that is a huge plus. It’s about average. Average width, decent height, but you have some decent depth of field, which is a plus. I do hear some nice layering of sound as well. However, all in all, the Kima 2’s soundstage is about average with other single DD sets around its cost. Now, this doesn’t mean the stage is not a benefit of this iem, because I do feel that the Kima 2 has a very well laid-out stage with a slightly more 3D aspect to it. It is perhaps a hair more intimate but there’s dimension to the sound.
Separation / Imaging
Now, instrument separation is actually quite good if you ask me. I know I said it was roughly average in my review but in truth the Kima 2 does a nice job of separating elements of an imaginary stage. I’d say that the only issues arise in Ultra congested music, as one should expect. Really, the clarity is so nice on this set that it is able to separate instruments and voices in a nice way. Imaging is even better. I have zero issues placing instruments within the sound field. Never are there any floating images, muffled images, or anything of the sort. Left to right is solid, front to back is also better than expected. You’ll hear some decent layering of sounds which only helps the mental picture. I’d say that Dunu did a nice job here. Obviously, the Kima 2 is not tops in class and many sets will show off a better ability to separate elements and image those elements. Still, the Kima 2 is nice.
Detail Retrieval
As far as detail retrieval is concerned, I’d say the Kima 2 is just above average. The macro clarity is too good, nice macro details, and yes, the subtle stuff can be picked up rather easily in the right tracks. It should go without saying that more congested music obviously will make it harder to dissect the minutiae. I can tell you that the Kima 2 is certainly not a detail beast, and it won’t be the envy of the audio world for its technical prowess, but I can’t sit here and call it bad either. Now, there’s no quantitative way to come up with this determination, but again, I’d say that the Kima 2 is probably just above the average set within its price point.
Comparisons
Dunu Kima Classic ($109)
I reviewed both of the previous iterations of the Dunu Kima series and the one which resonated with me the most (until the Kima 2) was the Kima Classic (Kima Classic Review). The Classic was crafted with an upgraded tuning from the OG Kima and was (in my opinion) an upgrade from the OG. Once again, the Kima Classic comes with a single 10mm DLC dynamic driver. You have an updated paint job on the Classic as well with a more coffee colored design. Very nice looking but beyond that, everything remained the same as far as build is concerned. The point of the Classic was to provide a more classical V-shaped tuning scheme. More bass impact, depth, more treble output etc. I’d say they accomplished their task because the Kima Classic is a nice sounding set.
Differences
Folks, the Kima Classic and Kima 2 are identical in all ways physically and aesthetically except for the color. Well, that and the Kima 2 has upgraded drivers and the 2-pin on the Kima 2 is more recessed. Beyond those things, these two are spot on identical. The vents are the same, writing on the faceplates is the same, same 3D looking “K”. Identical. Coincidentally, the price is also identical at right around $100 – $110. I think the similarities fade when you consider that the Kima 2 has a much better cable and more eartips. Both sets offer the same carrying case except they are different colors. Both give a solid unboxing experience for the cost. However, I would certainly say that the Kima 2 has the better unboxing.
Sound Differences
As far as sound differences, the Kima Classic comes across a hair warmer, less neutral, more like warm/neutral to my ears. Really, the difference is that the Classic is more fun, V-shaped in signature whereas the Kima 2 is the more mature, refined, and 5onally balanced of the two. The Classic has a deeper low-end, more slam, meatier low-end. While the Kima 2 has the better quality low-end with a more precise impact and definition. The Kima 2 has the faster bass, with more of a direct granite infused punch. The midrange is more recessed and pushed back on the Classic whereas the mids on the Kima 2 are absolutely wonderful. More forward, cleaner, better clarity, more melodic, more of a natural note weight and richness. The Classic is a hint thinner in this region. Now, the Classic has a brighter treble, more detailed, easier to gain fatigue, but it has a higher resolution to my ears up top. Having said that, the Kima 2 has the more tonally accurate and balanced treble, easier in the ears, and a better upper treble in my opinion. As far as detail retrieval, the Classic and the Kima 2 are both slightly above average though the Classic wins out by a slight degree in the treble area while the Kima 2 has the more defined bass and midrange. I’d say the soundstage size goes to the Classic while depth and layering goes to the Kima 2.
Final thoughts on this comparison
Honestly, I love that Dunu made almost identical sets yet switched up the tuning. Different flavors, if you will. Both are very well done per their respective tunings and per the cost. In fact, I still feel that the Classic is a highly underrated iem. However, I personally feel the Kima 2 is the better iem. It’s better almost across the board for me. The tonality and timbre are simply to die for on the Kima 2 and I find it is simply the more upscale version of the Kima series. That takes nothing away from the Classic. I’m sure that fans of a more V-shaped sound would not agree with me. Both are nice, but I’ll take the Kima 2.
Fiio FD15 ($149)
The Fiio FD15 (FD15 Review) is a criminally underrated iem. Let’s just get that out of the way. The fact that it isn’t being shared across social media by countless people is proof enough because the FD15 is one helluva iem. It truly is. In fact, it’s so good that this comparison isn’t really all that fair. The truth is, both sets are very similar in many ways. This is something that I noticed right away when listening to the Kima 2 for the 1st time. It was easy to spot the similarities. At any rate, the FD15 is a single dynamic driver earphone which consists of a massive 13.8 mm driver with a magnalium diaphragm and a DLC gasket. The highlights keep going though as the FD15 has a ton of physical tech and wizardry involved with the creation of the FD15. In my mind, the FD15 is one of the best iems period between $100 and $200. So again, maybe not a fair fight between the Kima 2 and FD15, but just for similarities sake it’s worth it to compare.
Differences
To begin, the difference in body style is pretty stark. The FD15 takes on Fiio’s very popular cylindrical body styles, whereas the Kima 2 is most certainly not that. The FD15 is heavier as well, denser, also made entirely of stainless steel. Oddly enough, the FD15 is also much smaller in stature. Both are nice to wear over long periods and neither feel heavy on the ear. I should add that the FD15 comes equipped with two sets of tuning nozzles, which is a nice inclusion. As far as design, I think they are both fantastic looking iems. I may like the FD15 a hair more, but I think Dunu did a marvelous job with this design and every design in the Kima series. Now, the unboxing is actually probably just as good on the Kima 2. Now, I’d say the cable of the FD15 is probably the better modular cable, as it is a Furukawa authentic cable. However, the Fiio case situation is very strange. Definitely the Kima 2 has the much better case. Both earphones come with a mountain of eartips and in truth, both brands are well known for providing great unboxing experiences. Of course, the FD15 is about $40 to $50 more in cost and so that should be noted.
Sound Differences
This brings us to the sound. Now, both iems are almost dead neutral and in truth they sound very similar across the board. Of course, there are certainly differences though. Both iems are superb in tonal accuracy with extremely natural timbre. Both sets exude this aspect of the sound, and both specialize in tonal balance. However, the FD15 has that massive 13.8mm DD which most certainly provides a more guttural depth and meaty slam. Both are tight and nicely resolved down low. The Kima 2 has a touch more forward midrange while the FD15 is definitely the more detailed set of the two. In a micro sense that is. Of course, neither set is a slouch. Really most technical aspects of the sound go to the FD15 as it is simply a touch more refined altogether. That said, I don’t know which set is the more engaging of the two, that’d be tough to answer. The treble region of both sets is mostly non-offensive, both have just enough brilliance to uplift the mix, and both have nice extension in the upper treble without any splashiness. Perhaps the Kima 2 has the faintest of hairs better extension, but that’s not entirely easy to hear. Again, technically both sets offer superbly clean sound, a I’ve average details, though I’d certainly say the FD15 has the edge. Especially in terms of soundstage as the FD15 has better width, just as much depth, and both iems have nice layering and imaging abilities.
Final thoughts on this comparison
Folks, these comparisons are a total crap shoot. I’m just being honest. Do you know how difficult it is to hear differences of any kind between these two sets? After hours of enjoyably going back and forth between the two I did come to the conclusion that the FD15 is probably the better set. More technically able whilst having just as engaging timbre and just as good of a tonal balance. The FD15 has the more bullish and organic bass helped by that enormous 13.8 mm DD. Trust me, the size makes a difference. However, is it worth $40 to $50 more? Probably not, is my answer. As solid as the FD15 is, I think the Kima 2 is likely the better buy. I feel that this comparison really drove that home for me.
Is it worth the asking price?
The answer to the question in the header is one of the easier questions to answer from this guy. I happen to really enjoy the Kima 2. I mean, really enjoy it. Also, I feel that Dunu honestly could’ve charged more for this iem. I mean, friends, the Dunu Kima 2 costs $100 for crying out loud. To have this level of balance, clarity, and this level of clean-cut musicality is a definite testament to the professionals over at Dunu. The Kima 2 shows me just how close Dunu got with the last two installments (Kima, Kima Classic) in this series. I feel that this time around, Dunu brought it all together. Also, understand that I’m saying this with all of the other iems within the price point sitting fresh within my mind as well. For the cost, the Kima 2 is a very well done iem.
Despite all of the nice words, the Dunu Kima 2 is not going to be loved universally. It’s a tough market for any iem to truly stand out and the truth is that not all people desire a neutral-ish, and tonally-balanced. Many people in the Hobby need that heavy weighted low-end that’ll satisfy certain genres. It’s not just the low-end, because how many friends of mine enjoy even more treble presence? Another thing is that there are iems less expensive iems which gets them 85-90% of the performance of the Kima 2. So, of course, the Kima 2 is not a perfect iem. Of course it has some subjective qualms. Hopefully I’ve detailed those slight issues in this review. However, let’s check out a few reasons why the Kima 2 is most certainly worth the cost of ownership.
The Why…
Because the Kima 2 has no glaring issues. I feel that Dunu covered almost everything with this set and there’s no wondering who the Kima 2 is for. Now, anytime you go so hard with one sound signature you are going to have a more polarizing sound. Having said that, the Kima 2 is solid across the board. For what it is, and for how Dunu envisioned the sound being, I’d say they absolutely nailed it! Made entirely out of stainless steel except the brass nozzle tips is a huge bonus. Friends, this set is built like a champ. Flat-out and hands-down! Though, watch in those winter months if you are outside with the Kima 2 as I can attest that they get super cold. Anyways, the look and design of the Kima 2 hasn’t changed much from previous Kima series sets, much to my delight. I love that Dunu kept the design. It’s tough. The Kima 2 is accessorized very well. Folks, I’d venture to say that it’s “one of”, if not “thee” best unboxing experiences for $100. That’s grossly debatable, but I simply haven’t seen many other sets which have a distinctly better unboxing. Again, there could be sets that I’m not thinking of at the moment. However, regardless of whether the Kima 2 is one of the best, or not, I can tell you that you are getting a ton of usable goodies in the packaging.
That sound!
As nice as the unboxing is, or the build, the design, etc. The true character of the Kima 2 is found in its tuning. Dunu did a very nice job here. Like I’ve said, the Kima 2 has a wonderfully balanced tuning with a quick and punchy low-end. It’s tight, very clean and well defined. That brings us to the gold star frequencies of the Kima 2, the midrange. Folks, the mids are some of the best mids that I’ve enjoyed around $100. Vocals are like butter, forward, yet not to a fault, as natural as can be. It’s creamy from the low-mids to the upper-mids and stuff like instruments are so well captured. Note weight is natural, timbre is natural, and without any sharpness or glare. The treble is tuned very nice in relation to the rest of the mix. Brilliant enough, clarity is high, yet they are so smooth, nothing shrill. I could keep going but no doubt if you are a natural lover and $100 is your price point, then the Kima 2 is a no brainer folks. Easily worth the cost of ownership.
Ratings (0-10)
Note: all ratings are based upon my subjective judgment. These ratings are garnered against either similarly priced sets or with similar driver implementations or styles with the unique parameters of my choosing. In the case of the Dunu Kima 2 ratings below, that would be $75-$125 earphones of any driver configuration. Please remember that “ratings” don’t tell the whole story. This leaves out nuance and a number of other qualities which make an iem what it is. A “5-6” is roughly average and please take into consideration the “lot” of iems these ratings are gathered against. $75-$125 is a fairly large sized scope of iems. So, it should be noteworthy to see a rating above a “9.0”. My ratings are never the same and each set of ratings tells a different story. Each time you read one of my ratings will be unique to that review. Basically, I create a Rating that makes sense to me.
Aesthetic
–Build Quality: 9.4 Stainless steel, wonderfully built.
–Look: 9.1 Love the look of this set.
–Fit/Comfort: 9.4 Fit and comfort is very good for me.
–Accessories: 9.7 One of the best around $100.
–Overall: 9.4🔥🔥
Sound Rating
–Timbre: 9.6 Some of the best timbre in the price point.
–Bass: 9.1 Punchy, textured, clean.
–Midrange: 9.5 Awesome for vocalists.
–Treble: 8.9 Non-offensive, sparkly, clean.
–Technicalities: 8.8 I’d say it’s above average across the board.
–Musicality: 9.4 So melodic, so tuneful!
–Overall: 9.2🔥🔥🔥
Ratings Summary:
Folks, I honestly don’t feel there’s anything to talk about here. I really truly feel that a “9.2” in “Overall Sound” is well beyond worth it. In my opinion. The Kima 2 hits in every area very well. I suppose anyone who needs and yearns for a bigger bass emphasis will likely not agree. However, I feel I’ve made it clear that the Kima 2 has a low-end which is judged by its quality over its quantity. It is a fantastically tuned iem. And I envision many folks adoring the Kima 2. I would go much longer here but I am up against a time crunch folks. However, these scores are legit in my opinion, what a fine set!
Conclusion
To conclude my full written review of the Dunu Kima 2, I’d first like to thank the awesome people of HiFiGo. You know who you are. Thank you very much. It would have been a crime had I never heard the Dunu Kima 2 & HiFiGo gave me that opportunity. So, thank you very much! HiFiGo has been one of my go-to online audio stores for years and they always have what I want. So, thanks a bunch! I also need to thank you, the reader, for clicking the link and checking out my full review. It means the world to us at Mobileaudiophile.com. Every click, and every moment/minute spent makes a difference in our success. So, thank you very much. I do hope that all your questions have been answered.
Different Perspectives
Now that you’ve read my full review, I do hope you’ll click some other links on other reviews, from other reviewers regarding the Kima 2. It’ll help you even more to understand the Kima 2, and to make a much better educated decision before you go and plop almost $100 down on this set. It’s always a good idea to get other perspectives from other reviewers. So please listen to, watch, or read other thoughts about this set folks and I do hope you find the perfect set for your listening sessions. Okay folks, I think I’m done! I hope each and every one of you are well and good. Please stay as safe as you are able and always… God Bless!
